Filed under: Analysis | Tags: Avoidance, Block, Ghostcrawler, main tank, patch 3.2, rage
In Wednesday’s post, I pointed you to some pretty epic Crab commentary that shines some light on where Blizzard is on Warrior Issues. I am going to try and break this down as much as I can to get to the good juicy bits.
I’m not sure that statement is accurate, but here is the problem. There are A LOT of warrior tanks. They are tanking every fight in Ulduar. If warriors were too low and if we buffed them, I don’t see how that would increase the numbers on the other tanks. I don’t think the conclusion to be drawn is that warriors are overpowered. I think the conclusion to be drawn is that warriors were the traditional tank and lot of established guilds have established MTs who see no reason to reroll the FotM. It’s not actually a goal to have 25% of each tank in Ulduar, but is also seems strange to buff the most popular tank. Won’t that just make them more popular? Again, don’t misinterpret that as GC sez suck it up warriors. It is something we have to keep in mind, however.
I love reading these things because it demonstrates that blizzard is tracking demographic data. I will admit though, I wish I could see how their parsing this data to come to this conclusion. Does “a lot of warrior tanks” include those who are leveling as prot because it is awesome and fast? Does “tanking every fight in Ulduar” also mean they’re tanking said fights successfully?
But let us step past these points and get to the meat of what he is saying, which is effectively that most guilds are using the same tank that they always have because they get the job done. To me, this precludes the important issue of leveling and gearing a tank. That time investment I think is the greater barrier to entry of new tanks of other classes. In effect, it’s not necessarily because we’re better tanks that we’re more populous, it’s because we have a head start on everyone else thanks to those years where warriors were the only tank class. Logically, I think this should mean that in terms of tank population, that Warriors should be at the top followed by Death Knights, Druids, and then Paladins. If anyone knows if this actually follows the demographics on the ground, I’d love to know.
Block is a systemic problem. We’re not sure we can make it a very compelling mitigation stat in a world where tank avoidance is so high and bosses hit so hard. However I will say that the Coliseum fights should focus less on the blow-your-cooldowns-or-die style of encounter.
Well, that would be a relief (thought I think it will make DKs rather unhappy) as I think part of the problem is encounter design in any case. It is hard, however, to ignore the fact that having added block rating or block value on gear feels rather like wasted itemization points. So what are we to do with block?
I’ve put in my two cents about this before, which pretty much comes down to “I’ll believe it when I see it.” Folding it into some sort of offensive Proc as Yakra Suggests is intriguing, but I’m not entirely sure where that puts Paladins (who also have shield issues). I don’t see this as comming to any conclusion in 3.2. It might be the job for a new expansion entirely.
Rage Mechanics Suck
There are some mechanics we’d like to change with warriors, as I have already stated. Having to spam Heroic Strike is definitely one of them. Rage starvation is never fun (which is not the same as “I can ignore rage.”) This is a slightly different argument that whether or not warriors have the stats they need to do the job, which seems to be the bigger concern in this forum at the moment. I am personally not particularly interested in who is the “easier” tank. I don’t think any of them are significantly different from each other. You still have to know when to use your cooldowns, when to swap your gear, how to coordinate with your raid and when it’s you that’s the problem and not your class…
…Rage starvation is a problem. Frankly, we’re not sure a model where you have to get hit in order to tank is that compelling anymore. Something that has come up a lot is changing rage (even for Prot) to damage done. This is a slight nerf to the PvP mechanic of being punished when you hit the warrior, but there are other ways to solve that as well. Again, we’re talking a big change here. I’m not sure we’re comfortable jacking with such a core mechanic before 3.2.
Personally, I think the whole “prot warriors generate rage when doing damage” is a great idea because it solves one of the core issues of prot tanking, which is that any avoidance you have hurts you a little bit. Now, don’t get me wrong, I’m not experiencing much in terms of rage starvation right now, but the impact by the numbers is hard to ignore. If you’re looking to create some balance in the force here, my advice to the Developers would be to try and develop a mechanic (or set of mechanics) that equalizes rage generation across gear sets. If threat suffers because of lack of hit or expertise, I think that is a different issue, but at least make it so we can have a chance to use our abilities even if we parry.
Our Cooldowns Suck
…for the encounters we’re doing right now.
This is the bit I think is missing from the discussion. Frankly, I wish it wasn’t even part of the discussion, but there it is. Why is it that so many encounters in Wrath seem designed to favor one type of cooldown over another? There is that tantalizing line “However I will say that the Coliseum fights should focus less on the blow-your-cooldowns-or-die style of encounter,” of course. But without any substance behind that it is really hard to guess what sort of encounter it will be. Mobility perhaps?
It really boils down to that it is hard to imagine a situation where cooldowns aren’t going to play a role in determining the “better” tank for the fight, and I am hard pressed to point to any Warrior cooldown that stands out particularly well on the field right now. How about some innnate Guardian Spirit goodness to my Last stand? Or, you know, a minute cooldown on my Shield Wall? Or some actual spell mitigation from Spell Reflect?
Or, better yet, let’s see Blizzard put on some serious encounter thinking caps and prove me wrong. I know there are challenges independent of cooldowns (Archimonde? Anybody?). I want to see them. I want to see them in 3.2. Show me the beef, or the crab cakes, or what have you.
I’m definitely doubtful that Blizzard will deliver on that promise, but this is definitely a time I would love to be wrong.
Ah Dual Specialization. You are such a mixed blessing.
Thus far, I have only bothered to buy Dual Spec with Tarsus. There are practical reasons for this of course – I have other things to blow money on now that I’m averaging 250 gold in repair bills a night in Ulduar for one. But other than that I can’t help but feel like I’ve got a touch of buyer’s remorse. Not that Titan’s Grip isn’t stupidly fun or anything, it is. It’s just… not as awesome as I thought it would be.
Allow me to be more specific.
There is surely a wide variety of opinion on the Avoidance vs Threat issue. If you aren’t familiar with these words as a tank, let me assure you that they are the basis for a great deal of tanking jargon. If you were seated with a bunch of tanks, having a drink, it would be perfectly expect for them to ask “So %T, Avoidance or Threat?” As if this innocent question were simply a question about underwear choice.
Oh no. This is about destiny. It is about gear choice. It’s about saying “So, whose side are you on? Are you competing for my gear? Or the Tauren’s?”